Benjamin Seigel

MemberLandlord and Tenant BoardOntario

Orders listed182 against the landlord

Awarded to tenants$11,768avg $654

Awarded to landlords$0avg $0

Fines to the board$0none ordered

Read these numbers carefully. They cover the orders Renterly has processed from applications brought by tenants — not applications brought by landlords, which make up most of a tribunal's caseload and are not listed here. Both directions of an order are counted, including applications that were dismissed or decided for the landlord. Amounts are what the order directed, not what was shown to have been paid, and orders we have not finished processing are missing entirely.

Orders

Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 27, 2026$1,768 to the tenant
The LTB ordered the landlord to pay the tenant $1,768 for unpaid compensation following an N13 notice of termination, plus the tenant's filing fee. The landlord acknowledged not paying the required one month's rent compensation.
LTB-T-048654-25 · T1 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 26, 2026
The tenant withdrew their application after moving, and the tribunal consented to the withdrawal and dismissed the case. No findings or orders were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-005561-24 · T2 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 23, 2026
The tenant withdrew their application after reaching an agreement with the landlord, and the application was dismissed as withdrawn. No findings were made against either party.
LTB-T-046357-25 · T2 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 23, 2026$10,000 to the tenant
The tenant claimed the landlord and purchaser gave a bad faith notice of termination. The tribunal found the landlord not liable but the purchaser liable, and the purchaser agreed on consent to pay the tenant $10,000.
LTB-T-090599-24 · T5 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 22, 2026
The tenant's application to reduce the rent was dismissed because the tenant did not attend the hearing. No findings were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-065487-25 · T3 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 22, 2026
The tenant withdrew their application, and the Board consented to the withdrawal, dismissing the application. No findings were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-072877-24 · T2 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 21, 2026
The tribunal dismissed the tenant's application, finding the tenancy was exempt from the Residential Tenancies Act because the tenant shared a kitchen and bathroom with the landlord, who lived in the same building. No relief was granted against either party.
LTB-T-048085-25 · T1 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 20, 2026
The tenant withdrew their application after saying the issues were resolved, and the Board consented. The application was dismissed as withdrawn, with no findings against the landlord.
LTB-T-051004-23 · T1;T2 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 15, 2026
The tenant withdrew their application and the tribunal consented to the withdrawal, dismissing the case. No findings were made against either party.
LTB-T-043657-25 · T2 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 13, 2026
The tenant withdrew their application after resolving the issues with the landlord. The tribunal consented to the withdrawal and dismissed the application, with no findings or orders against either party.
LTB-T-029843-25 · T2 · read the order
Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 13, 2026
The tenant applied for a rent reduction because the landlord stopped providing free visitor parking. The tribunal dismissed the application because it was filed more than a year after the alleged discontinuance.
LTB-T-057044-25 · T3 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 12, 2026
The tenant withdrew the application before any findings were made. The tribunal consented to the withdrawal and closed the file.
LTB-T-041191-25 · T5 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 12, 2026
The tenant's application was dismissed because the tenant did not attend the hearing; no findings were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-047571-25 · T1 · read the order
Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 12, 2026
The tenant claimed the landlord collected illegal rent increases. The application was dismissed because the first increase was deemed lawful under the Act and the second was within the permitted guideline.
LTB-T-049061-25 · T1 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 9, 2026
The tenant withdrew their application, and the tribunal dismissed it as withdrawn. No findings or orders were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-009259-25 · T5 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 9, 2026
The tenant withdrew the application and the tribunal dismissed it as withdrawn. No findings were made against either party.
LTB-T-072599-24 · T2;T6 · read the order
Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 7, 2026
The tribunal found that the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 applies to this tenancy, rejecting the landlord's claim that it was a commercial tenancy. This is a finding against the landlord.
LTB-T-047845-24 · A1 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 6, 2026
The tenant's application was withdrawn with the board's consent and dismissed. No orders were made against either party.
LTB-T-034636-25 · T2 · read the order