Bryan Delorenzi

MemberLandlord and Tenant BoardOntario

Orders listed237 against the landlord

Awarded to tenants$29,367avg $1,277

Awarded to landlords$0avg $0

Fines to the board$0none ordered

Read these numbers carefully. They cover the orders Renterly has processed from applications brought by tenants — not applications brought by landlords, which make up most of a tribunal's caseload and are not listed here. Both directions of an order are counted, including applications that were dismissed or decided for the landlord. Amounts are what the order directed, not what was shown to have been paid, and orders we have not finished processing are missing entirely.

Orders

No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 27, 2026
The parties settled the tenant's maintenance application by consent. The landlord agreed to complete several repairs by specified dates, and the parties agreed to communicate respectfully.
LTB-T-034603-25 · T6 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 26, 2026
The tenant withdrew their application at the hearing, and the tribunal consented. The application was closed with no findings or remedies against either party.
LTB-T-038099-25 · T2 · read the order
Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 26, 2026$2,679 to the tenant
The tribunal found the landlord failed to maintain the rental unit after repeated flooding and ordered the landlord to pay the tenant a rent abatement and the filing fee.
LTB-T-077521-23 · T6 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 22, 2026$2,750 to the tenant
The tenant's maintenance application was resolved by consent order. The landlord agreed to pay the tenant $2,750, to be recovered through deductions from rent.
LTB-T-038722-25 · T6 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 22, 2026$147 to the tenant
The tenant and landlord settled the maintenance application at a case conference. The landlord agreed to pay the tenant $147, which the tenant can deduct from the next month's rent.
LTB-T-042037-25 · T6 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 21, 2026
The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed because it lacked sufficient detail. No findings were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-007745-24 · T6 · read the order
Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 21, 2026$3,710 to the tenant
The tribunal found the landlord failed to maintain the sauna and playhouse and awarded a rent abatement. It also found the landlord illegally retained an excess rent deposit and ordered repayment with interest and filing fees.
LTB-T-027280-23 · T1;T5 · read the order
Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 21, 2026$3,710 to the tenant
The tribunal found the landlord breached maintenance obligations for the sauna and playhouse and illegally retained an excess rent deposit, ordering the landlord to pay the tenants $3,709.73. The tenants' claims for interference and bad-faith eviction were withdrawn.
LTB-T-073215-22 · T2;T6 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 20, 2026
The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed because the tenant failed to comply with a prior interim order and the application was too vague. No finding was made against the landlord.
LTB-T-017904-24 · T6 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 19, 2026
The tenant did not attend the hearing, so the tribunal dismissed the tenant's application as abandoned. No findings were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-072772-23 · T6;T2 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 19, 2026
The tenant withdrew their application at the hearing, and the tribunal consented, closing the file. No findings were made against either party.
LTB-T-101305-25 · T1 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 12, 2026
The tenant's application was dismissed because the tenant did not attend the hearing. No findings were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-028799-25 · T2 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 12, 2026
The tenant did not attend the hearing, so the tribunal dismissed the tenant's application as abandoned. No findings were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-031892-25 · T2;T6 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 12, 2026
The tenant did not attend the hearing, so the tribunal dismissed the application as abandoned. No findings or orders were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-033942-25 · T6 · read the order
Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 8, 2026$3,168 to the tenant
The tribunal found the landlord breached the Residential Tenancies Act by substantially interfering with the tenant's enjoyment, harassing the tenant, and failing to maintain adequate heat and lighting in the basement unit. The landlord was ordered to pay the tenant $3,168.00, which includes a rent abatement and the tenant's filing fee.
LTB-T-015617-24 · T1;T2;T6 · read the order
Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 8, 2026$3,168 to the tenant
The tribunal found the landlord breached the Act by substantially interfering with the tenant's enjoyment, harassing the tenant, and failing to maintain the unit. The landlord was ordered to pay the tenant $3,168.00 in rent abatement and filing fees.
LTB-T-016941-23 · T6 · read the order
Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 8, 2026$3,168 to the tenant
The tribunal found the landlord harassed the tenant, interfered with their reasonable enjoyment, and failed to maintain the unit. The landlord was ordered to pay the tenant $3,168.00 in rent abatement and the application filing fee.
LTB-T-018364-23 · T1 · read the order
Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 8, 2026$3,168 to the tenant
The tribunal found the landlord substantially interfered with the tenant's reasonable enjoyment, harassed the tenant, and failed to maintain the unit (heat, lighting, and fireplace) and ordered the landlord to pay $3,168.00 in rent abatement and filing fees.
LTB-T-020507-23 · T2 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 8, 2026
The tenant's application was dismissed because the tenant did not attend the hearing, so the tribunal treated it as abandoned. No findings or orders were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-026378-25 · T2 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 8, 2026
The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed because the tenant did not attend the hearing. No findings or orders were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-030237-25 · T6 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 7, 2026
The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed because the tenant did not attend the hearing. No findings or orders were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-031905-25 · T6 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 5, 2026$3,700 to the tenant
The tenant's bad-faith eviction application was settled by consent, with the purchaser agreeing to pay the tenant $3,700. No findings of fault were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-063525-22 · T5 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 5, 2026
The tenant applied alleging illegal entry, lock changes, and harassment. The parties resolved the application by consent, with the landlord agreeing not to enter the unit except as permitted by the Act.
LTB-T-096250-25 · T2 · read the order