Nancy Morris
MemberLandlord and Tenant BoardOntario
Read these numbers carefully. They cover the orders Renterly has processed from applications brought by tenants — not applications brought by landlords, which make up most of a tribunal's caseload and are not listed here. Both directions of an order are counted, including applications that were dismissed or decided for the landlord. Amounts are what the order directed, not what was shown to have been paid, and orders we have not finished processing are missing entirely.
Orders
- Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 26, 2026$20,000 to the tenant
The parties agreed to a consent order resolving the tenant's application. The former landlord must pay the tenant $20,000, and the landlord waives rent until March 31, 2026.
LTB-T-059091-25 · T2 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 23, 2026$200 to the tenant
The tenant's application was resolved by a consent order in which the landlord agreed to pay the tenant $200. No wrongdoing was found against either party.
LTB-T-072509-25 · T1 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 19, 2026
The tenants' application was dismissed because they did not attend the hearing. No findings or orders were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-059752-25 · T3 · read the order
- Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 15, 2026$16,390 to the tenant
The tribunal found the landlord served a bad-faith N12 notice and ordered him to pay the tenants $16,389.87 in compensation, rent differential, moving costs and filing fees. The tenants' separate harassment/interference application was dismissed as filed too late.
LTB-T-010628-23 · T1;T2;T5 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 15, 2026
The tenant's application was dismissed because the tenant did not attend the hearing. No finding or remedy was made against the landlord.
LTB-T-046677-25 · T1 · read the order
- Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 14, 2026
The tenants claimed the landlord interfered with their reasonable enjoyment, but the tribunal found they did not prove the allegations and dismissed the application. No remedies were ordered against the landlord.
LTB-T-011156-24 · T2 · read the order
- Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 13, 2026
The tribunal dismissed the tenants' maintenance application after finding the landlord's responses to reported issues were timely and appropriate. No remedy was ordered against the landlord.
LTB-T-054044-23 · T6 · read the order
- Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 9, 2026$1,112 to the tenant
The tribunal found the landlord substantially interfered with the tenant's reasonable enjoyment by failing to address excessive noise from a games room, and ordered the landlord to pay the tenant a rent abatement plus the application filing fee. The tenant's other claims about a roommate and a refused sublet were dismissed.
LTB-T-049929-23 · T2 · read the order
- Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 9, 2026
The tenant applied alleging the landlord kept money illegally, but the tribunal ruled the claim was about an unperformed refrigerator repair and dismissed the application. No order was made against the landlord.
LTB-T-063970-25 · T1 · read the order
- Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 9, 2026$1,083 to the tenant
The tribunal dismissed the tenant's claims about maintenance and interference with reasonable enjoyment, but found the landlord illegally kept part of the tenant's last month's rent deposit and ordered repayment plus the filing fee.
LTB-T-092519-23 · T1;T2;T6 · read the order
- Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 8, 2026$8,383 to the tenant
The tribunal found that the landlord withheld heat, harassed and threatened the tenants, and locked them out, ordering the landlord to pay $8,383 in compensation, damages, and filing fees.
LTB-T-046307-22 · T2;T6 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 7, 2026
The tenant applied claiming the landlord collected money illegally, but the tenant did not attend the hearing. The tribunal dismissed the application as abandoned, with no finding against either party.
LTB-T-064716-25 · T1 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 7, 2026
The tenant's application was dismissed because neither party attended the hearing, so the tribunal treated it as abandoned. No findings or orders were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-064785-25 · T1 · read the order
- Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 6, 2026
The tribunal dismissed the tenant's application for interference with reasonable enjoyment because the application was confusing, lacked dates and details, and contained speculative allegations. No findings or remedies were ordered against the landlord.
LTB-T-039933-23 · T2 · read the order