Sonia Anwar-Ali
MemberLandlord and Tenant BoardOntario
Read these numbers carefully. They cover the orders Renterly has processed from applications brought by tenants — not applications brought by landlords, which make up most of a tribunal's caseload and are not listed here. Both directions of an order are counted, including applications that were dismissed or decided for the landlord. Amounts are what the order directed, not what was shown to have been paid, and orders we have not finished processing are missing entirely.
Orders
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 22, 2026
The tribunal dismissed the tenant's application because the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 does not apply to the relationship between the tenant and the person named as landlord, who was actually a tenant renting out rooms without the owner's consent. No findings or orders were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-035128-25 · T1;T2 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 21, 2026
The tenant's application about interference with reasonable enjoyment and maintenance was dismissed because the tenant did not attend the hearing and the issues were already resolved by a prior order. No findings were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-029226-25 · T2;T6 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 20, 2026$3,516 to the tenant
The tenant's application about interference and harassment was resolved by consent. The landlord agreed to pay the tenant $3,516, credited against rent arrears owed under earlier orders.
LTB-T-030694-25 · T2 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 20, 2026
The tenant's application was dismissed because the tenant did not attend the hearing, and the tribunal found the application abandoned. No findings were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-033554-25 · T2 · read the order
- Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 19, 2026$1,200 to the tenant
The landlord consented to pay the tenant $1,200 after the tenant complained about illegal entry, interference, and harassment. The landlord's separate application was withdrawn.
LTB-T-030632-25 · T2 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 16, 2026
The tenant did not attend the hearing, so the tribunal dismissed the tenant's application as abandoned. No findings or orders were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-011800-25 · T2 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 15, 2026
The tenant did not attend the hearing, so the tribunal dismissed the application as abandoned. No findings or orders were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-009948-25 · T2 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 15, 2026
The tenant's application was dismissed because the tenant did not attend the hearing. No findings were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-029378-25 · T2 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 15, 2026
The parties resolved the tenant's application by consent at a case conference. The landlord agreed to waive a debt from a previous order, and no findings of wrongdoing were made.
LTB-T-030267-25 · T2 · read the order
- Decision against landlordJanuary 6, 2026$98 to the tenant$250 fine
The tribunal found the landlord partially interfered with the tenant's reasonable enjoyment by restricting laundry room access. The landlord must pay the tenant $98 and a $250 fine, while most other claims were dismissed.
Unit B, 97 Camborne Avenue, Toronto
LTB-T-043312-22 · T2;T6 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 5, 2026
The tenant's application was discontinued because the tenant failed to pay board costs ordered in an earlier order. No finding was made against the landlord.
LTB-T-048046-25 · T2 · read the order