Fabio Quattrociocchi
MemberLandlord and Tenant BoardOntario
Read these numbers carefully. They cover the orders Renterly has processed from applications brought by tenants — not applications brought by landlords, which make up most of a tribunal's caseload and are not listed here. Both directions of an order are counted, including applications that were dismissed or decided for the landlord. Amounts are what the order directed, not what was shown to have been paid, and orders we have not finished processing are missing entirely.
Orders
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 27, 2026
The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed because the tenant did not attend the hearing. No findings were made against either party.
LTB-T-039623-25 · T6 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 23, 2026
The tenants withdrew their application at the hearing and the tribunal consented, closing the file without any findings against the landlord.
LTB-T-020460-24 · T2;T6 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 23, 2026
The tenant withdrew their application at the hearing, and the tribunal consented, closing the file. No findings were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-068259-23 · T2 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 22, 2026
The tenant's application was dismissed because the tenant did not attend the hearing. No findings were made against either party.
LTB-T-032458-25 · T2 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 20, 2026
The tenant withdrew their application at the hearing and the tribunal consented to the withdrawal. No findings or orders were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-017384-24 · T2 · read the order
- Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 15, 2026$11,568 to the tenant$15,000 fine
The tribunal denied the landlord's request to review an earlier order that found the landlord gave a notice of termination in bad faith. The earlier order stands: the landlord must pay the tenant $11,568 in compensation and a $15,000 administrative fine to the LTB.
LTB-T-015138-25 · T5 · read the order
- Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 15, 2026$4,378 to the tenant
The tribunal found the landlord breached maintenance obligations and ordered the landlord to pay the tenant a rent abatement, general compensation, and the filing fee. The tenant's T1 claim was withdrawn and the T2 claim was dismissed.
LTB-T-031998-25 · T1;T2;T6 · read the order
- Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 9, 2026$208 to the tenant
The tribunal found the landlords breached their maintenance obligations regarding mice and bedbugs, and ordered them to pay the tenant a rent abatement and the filing fee. The landlords were not found liable for the bathroom leak or the other claimed expenses.
LTB-T-039799-22 · T6 · read the order
- Findings both waysNot yet reviewedJanuary 8, 2026$4,243 to the tenant$6,960 to the landlord
The tribunal found the landlord breached maintenance obligations regarding cockroaches, a bathtub, and electrical issues, awarding the tenant a rent abatement and filing fee. The tenant still owes rent arrears to the landlord, and the net amount payable is $1,416.76.
LTB-T-034375-23 · T6;T2 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 8, 2026
The tenant withdrew their application at the hearing, and the tribunal closed the file with no findings against anyone.
LTB-T-035748-25 · T2 · read the order
- Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 7, 2026$8,327 to the tenant
The tribunal found the landlord breached maintenance obligations and interfered with the tenant's reasonable enjoyment regarding the dryer, washer, snow removal, parking, and harassment. The landlord was ordered to pay the tenant $8,327.32 in rent abatement, out-of-pocket expenses, and filing fees.
LTB-T-061238-24 · T6 · read the order
- Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 7, 2026$8,327 to the tenant
The tribunal found that the landlord breached maintenance obligations and substantially interfered with the tenant's reasonable enjoyment regarding the dryer, washing machine, snow removal, parking, and by advertising the unit while the tenant still lived there. The landlord was ordered to pay the tenant $8,327.32.
LTB-T-064066-22 · T2 · read the order
- Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 6, 2026$22,288 to the tenant
The tribunal found that the purchaser gave the N12 notice in bad faith and ordered the purchaser to pay the tenant $22,287.82 in compensation. The original landlords were found not to have acted in bad faith.
LTB-T-054303-22 · T5 · read the order