Alicia Johnson

MemberLandlord and Tenant BoardOntario

Orders listed144 against the landlord

Awarded to tenants$2,922avg $209

Awarded to landlords$0avg $0

Fines to the board$1,000on 1 order

Read these numbers carefully. They cover the orders Renterly has processed from applications brought by tenants — not applications brought by landlords, which make up most of a tribunal's caseload and are not listed here. Both directions of an order are counted, including applications that were dismissed or decided for the landlord. Amounts are what the order directed, not what was shown to have been paid, and orders we have not finished processing are missing entirely.

Orders

No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 26, 2026
The tenant asked to withdraw their application at the hearing, and the tribunal consented, closing the file. No findings or orders were made against either party.
LTB-T-087621-24 · T2;T6 · read the order
Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 23, 2026$1,648 to the tenant
The tribunal found that the landlord illegally retained the tenant's last month's rent deposit and ordered the landlord to repay the deposit plus the tenant's filing fee.
LTB-T-060880-25 · T1 · read the order
Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 23, 2026$678 to the tenant
The tribunal issued a consent order requiring the landlord to pay $678 toward replacement carpet, pay for carpet installation, and repair the front entry stairs by April 13, 2026. The tenant must pay any balance of the carpet cost and prepare the unit for installation.
LTB-T-064320-23 · T6 · read the order
Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 22, 2026$348 to the tenant
The tenant applied about an illegal key deposit. The tribunal ordered the landlord to repay the $300 key deposit plus the tenant's $48 filing fee, for a total of $348.
LTB-T-056598-25 · T1 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 16, 2026
The tenant's application was dismissed because the tenant did not attend the hearing. No findings or orders were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-041270-24 · T6;T2 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 15, 2026
The tenant's application was dismissed after the tenant failed to attend the hearing, so no findings were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-054488-25 · T1 · read the order
Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 14, 2026
The tenant's maintenance application about radon levels was dismissed. The tribunal found the landlord responded reasonably and did not breach maintenance obligations.
LTB-T-061995-24 · T6 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 14, 2026
The tenant applied for a refund of money she said the landlord collected illegally, but the application was dismissed because it was filed more than one year after the money was collected. No finding was made against the landlord.
LTB-T-064965-25 · T1 · read the order
Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 13, 2026
The tenants sought return of $4,000 paid toward a deposit and first and last months' rent, but the tribunal found the arrangement was an unlawful sublet and it lacked jurisdiction. The application was dismissed, with no order for anything to be paid.
LTB-T-063834-25 · T1 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 13, 2026
The tribunal dismissed the tenant's application because the rental unit is exempt from the Residential Tenancies Act since the tenant shares a bathroom or kitchen with the owner, who lives in the building. No findings or orders were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-090573-25 · T2 · read the order
No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 12, 2026
The tenants' application was dismissed because neither the tenants nor the landlord attended the hearing; the application was found abandoned. No findings or remedies were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-061281-25 · T1 · read the order
Decision against landlordJanuary 5, 2026$248 to the tenant$1,000 fine
The landlord harassed and interfered with the tenant by renting an unapproved basement unit and asking the tenant to pretend to be guests. The landlord was ordered to pay the tenant $248 and a $1,000 administrative fine.
Unit BASEMENT, 1 Tobosa Trail, Brampton
LTB-T-028661-22 · T2 · read the order
Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 5, 2026
The tenants applied for compensation over uneven patio stones, but the tribunal dismissed the application after finding the landlord responded reasonably and did not breach maintenance obligations. No remedy was ordered against the landlord.
LTB-T-068607-24 · T6 · read the order
Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 5, 2026
The tribunal dismissed the tenant's application, finding the landlord's repeated entries for inspections and repairs did not substantially interfere with the tenant's reasonable enjoyment or amount to harassment. The tenant did not prove the allegations on a balance of probabilities.
LTB-T-082531-22 · T2 · read the order