Alex Brkic
MemberLandlord and Tenant BoardOntario
Read these numbers carefully. They cover the orders Renterly has processed from applications brought by tenants — not applications brought by landlords, which make up most of a tribunal's caseload and are not listed here. Both directions of an order are counted, including applications that were dismissed or decided for the landlord. Amounts are what the order directed, not what was shown to have been paid, and orders we have not finished processing are missing entirely.
Orders
- Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 20, 2026
The tribunal determined that the Residential Tenancies Act applies to the tenancy, finding the tenant rented an attic room under a residential sublease and rejecting the landlord's claim that the tenancy was commercial and exempt. This finding was in favour of the tenant and against the landlord.
LTB-T-086623-24 · A1 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 12, 2026
The tenants' applications were dismissed because neither party attended the hearing and the tribunal found the applications abandoned. No findings or remedies were ordered against the landlord.
LTB-T-004461-24 · T6;T2 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 12, 2026
The tenant did not attend the hearing, so the tribunal dismissed their applications as abandoned. No findings or orders were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-061681-24 · T1;T2 · read the order
- Decision against tenantNot yet reviewedJanuary 9, 2026
The tenants' T2 application was dismissed because it was blank and lacked any particulars. No remedy was ordered against the landlord.
LTB-T-074419-24 · T2 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 8, 2026
The tenant's maintenance application was dismissed because the tenant did not attend the hearing. No findings or orders were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-080207-24 · T6 · read the order
- Decision against landlordNot yet reviewedJanuary 7, 2026$1,298 to the tenant
The tribunal found the landlord substantially interfered with the tenants' reasonable enjoyment by failing to properly notify them about emergency flood repairs and the true scope of the work. The landlord was ordered to pay the tenants $1,298.00, including a rent abatement and the application filing fee.
LTB-T-079925-22 · T2 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 6, 2026
The tenant did not attend the hearing, so the tribunal dismissed the application as abandoned. No finding was made against the landlord.
LTB-T-080253-24 · T6 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 5, 2026
The tenant did not attend the hearing, so the tribunal dismissed the tenant's application as abandoned. No finding was made against either party.
LTB-T-073421-24 · T2 · read the order
- No finding against either partyNot yet reviewedJanuary 5, 2026
The tenant's application was dismissed because the tenant did not attend the hearing. No findings were made against the landlord.
LTB-T-074982-24 · T2 · read the order